Stripping British Citizenship. Any thoughts?

This provision also is controversial, so I am taking an unscientific informal poll of the LSE community on stripping British Citizenship of those committing mass capital crimes, and/or acts of terrorism resulting in loss of life, and/or committing high treason resulting in death of other persons.  Please give me thoughts on this topic, or any additional input you may provide.

 “If a person is convicted by the Courts of having committed mass capital crimes, and/or acts of terrorism resulting in loss of life, and/or committing high treason resulting in death of other persons, then Parliament is authorized to pass legislation stripping that person of British Citizenship, in addition to the person serving time in prison.  If the convicted person has no other national citizenship, then Parliament is authorized to enter into treaties and compensate an allowable third party nation(s) to give citizenship to that convicted person, and serve the prison term within that third party nation.”

First and foremost, this provision authorizes Parliament (not mandates them) to enact such legislation.  Second, this provision is intended for the worst of the worst criminals so to strip away their British citizenship, and to remove them from the UK.  Because there are international conventions forbidding making a person “stateless”, I add the provision that Parliament may make treaties with an allowable third party nation(s) who is/are willing to take that person(s) for citizenship (for a fee), this way that person at no time is “stateless”;  hence, not violating those international conventions forbidding “statelessness”.  The word “allowable” is intended to limit the third party nation(s) that has/have a good human rights record (as determined by Parliament). 

No comments yet, be the first to post one!
Share